Jump to content




Photo

Legacy Case Wins!


  • Please log in to reply
39 replies to this topic

#31 isaacalum

isaacalum

    Advanced Member

  • Active Members
  • 373 posts
  • Location:leeds
  • england

Posted 15 November 2012 - 05:33 PM

it seems like they can't get emergency travel doccs for your removal this could be that they cant prove your rwandese a window for you to find any thing really that you can use to fight back its some how good on your side if you can show you privet and family life in uk is strong and would be an reasonable to expect you to return to a country you haven't been for so long and disproportional to your human rights established private and family life that delay in dealing with your claim as contributed



#32 bakesigaki

bakesigaki

    Senior Member

  • Active Members
  • 298 posts
  • Location:newcastle
  • england

Posted 16 November 2012 - 12:36 PM

cheers mate, that is what iam planning to do coz time is going very fast when other people like me are left behind.

#33 isaacalum

isaacalum

    Advanced Member

  • Active Members
  • 373 posts
  • Location:leeds
  • england

Posted 28 November 2012 - 04:22 PM

Hi forum i was wandering if one's further submissions were made in light of paragraph 395 according to the judgement in Mohammed, would this paragraph still apply when making a decision on a case under legacy with an out standing application?, this being made before the changes in the ukba's polices too effect or would the new immigration rules and requirements be taken in consideration when reaching a decision?.

#34 mkhari

mkhari

    Prefered Member

  • Active Members
  • 813 posts
  • Location:leicester
  • england

Posted 28 November 2012 - 05:31 PM

also if anybody FLRO is pending from 2007
on which paragraph they will decide
395c or 353

#35 onos

onos

    Junior Member

  • Platinum Members
  • 140 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:london
  • england

Posted 28 November 2012 - 06:02 PM

same goes with my case onos reconsideration for over 2 yrs now on article 8

.

Hello everyone, I asked a question sometime ago if RECONSIDERATION case on article 8&3 pending over 2 years
falls under LEGACY ? ur contributions will be much appreciated.

#36 Prince74

Prince74

    Prince74

  • Platinum Members
  • 1,691 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London
  • Interests:Football, cycling, gym
  • england

Posted 28 November 2012 - 06:16 PM

@mkhari, it would be 353

@onos, it is not Legacy

#37 geffy

geffy

    Senior Member

  • Active Members
  • 169 posts
  • Location:london
  • england

Posted 28 November 2012 - 06:24 PM

also if anybody FLRO is pending from 2007
on which paragraph they will decide
395c or 353

Mkari u remember when they refused my legacy case in 2010.at same time I was submitted set O the both was refused with right of Appel but I loss that Appel as will then I went Liverpool submited the further sub on the. 12 July 2011. They consider my application 395c act but I received my lit in sept 22/2011 395c r 353 is the same any way

#38 isaacalum

isaacalum

    Advanced Member

  • Active Members
  • 373 posts
  • Location:leeds
  • england

Posted 28 November 2012 - 07:05 PM

I think there should be some light shed on this issue in regards to how the changes made in polices and rules plus amendments in requirements for applications to succed affect applicants, all this caused by lengthy periods to reach a decision which in turn deprives some one of a chance to Benefit from the previous amended polices, my own opinion is that some how this should be raised at some point

#39 mkhari

mkhari

    Prefered Member

  • Active Members
  • 813 posts
  • Location:leicester
  • england

Posted 28 November 2012 - 09:02 PM

@mkhari, it would be 353

@onos, it is not Legacy



thanks
according to my understanding
after this
http://www.freemovem...gacy-case-wins/

if any FLRO pending on human right grounds from long time
shud also consider with 395c

there is a argument that if they consider under 353 according to new law
then delay is from UKBA not from the applicant
http://www.bailii.or.../2006/1713.html
and if appelant chase them properly and keep in touch then
i thing in JR 395c is agruable


this point also raise ukba chief inspector if delay from ukba and appealnt chase them
shud grant him leave

Edited by mkhari, 28 November 2012 - 09:09 PM.


#40 onos

onos

    Junior Member

  • Platinum Members
  • 140 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:london
  • england

Posted 28 November 2012 - 10:18 PM

@mkhari, it would be 353

@onos, it is not Legacy



Thanks Prince74




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users